Water Damage — Early 2000s, Cleveland
Six Feet Away
A friend called. Jeff went to see if he could save anything. He was told to stay away — bed bugs. So he stood on the sidewalk and watched.
"Saw it out front waiting for the garbage men to take them all away."
"From around six feet away on the sidewalk."
An estimated five hundred to one thousand works. No inventory. Most had never been photographed. Some of what he considered his best work.
"I made some great large pieces and I thought they were really good."
"Only in one picture."
Some of the lost works survive in exactly one photograph — taken incidentally, where the work appears in the background of something else. You can see it was there. You cannot see it clearly. That is all that's left.
"Sad. Enough."
The archive you are looking at now exists because of what happened on that sidewalk. The 1,084 works here are what the water didn't reach.
Oral history needed
When exactly did the water damage happen? What specific works were lost — medium, scale, subject? Which did Jeff consider his best? One lost work is known to have been a full-size interpretation of Picasso's Guernica (approximately 11 × 25 feet), made in his studio, never photographed. Its appearance and content have not yet been captured. This is the most time-sensitive gap in the archive.
All quotes verbatim from oral history sessions, June 2026. → See also: Lost Works
Cleveland Institute of Art — Late 1970s
The CIA Sculpture
There is a sculpture somewhere in the world that Jeff made at art school in the late 1970s.
Prism paper applied to sections of iron gridwork found in a junkyard. Something torn from a magazine incorporated into the surface. Approximately 38 inches wide, 24 inches tall, 3 or 4 inches deep. It hung on a wall.
He showed it at a student show. Someone bought it.
Jeff does not know who. He does not know where the piece is now. No photograph exists.
That person has lived with that piece for nearly fifty years. They may not know who made it. They may have kept it or discarded it. There is no way to know.
This work is not in the archive. It was the first documented sale — and it left before there was a record to leave behind.
Open question
What did it feel like when the piece sold? Jeff was asked this once and declined to answer. The question remains open for a future session.
Documented fact from oral history session, June 2026.
Returning to the Work — Late 1990s
Ha Ha Ha
When the kids were heading toward college, Jeff thought maybe making things could be a way to earn some extra money. He was still working as a designer. There was a little more time.
"Ha Ha Ha — 30 odd years ago and still making artwork."
That's roughly how that went. Not a career in art. Not an income. Just still making things, thirty years after the plan was to become a fine artist.
The making had become identity by then. The found objects weren't a workaround anymore — they were the method.
"Became a way of my life making art / never had money / jealous of all the other artist that did."
The jealousy was specifically about materials, not recognition or status. Other artists had studios and budgets. He had what was around.
Quotes verbatim from oral history session, June 2026. Surrounding context is paraphrase — confirmed as accurate in substance.
A Realization Over Decades
What Rauschenberg Already Did
Over the course of decades of research — not a single moment, but a slow accumulation — Jeff came to understand that Robert Rauschenberg had already explored much of the territory he had been working in. Combines built from anything. Found material as valid as paint. The permission to use discarded things.
When asked what he had wanted from his work at CIA: "Wanted to be a fine artist."
When asked what he discovered about Rauschenberg's work over the years: "Nothing ground breaking" — meaning his own work. He realized it wasn't breaking new ground. Someone had already been there.
When asked what he did: "Kept going."
Why he kept going after this realization — with the art world not paying attention, with the territory already mapped — is the most important unanswered question in this archive.
Q: Why? If you knew it wasn't groundbreaking, if the art world wasn't paying attention —
A: [ended session]
Oral history needed — central question
Why did he keep going? This question has not been fully answered. It may be the question that most deserves an answer. It will be returned to in a future session.
Quotes verbatim from oral history session, June 2026.
Found Materials — Across the Practice
Something That Still Had a Life Left in It
Art supplies were always too expensive.
"Art supplies were always too expensive."
So the work was built from what was available. CDs. Computer floppies. Keyboards. Prism paper from school. Things from the dollar store. Tape.
"Something that still had a life left in it."
This wasn't a conceptual position at first — it was financial reality. Over time, it became identity. Discarded objects becoming something else was not just necessity. It was how Jeff understood what making things meant.
If money were no object, he would work like Anselm Kiefer — large studio, monumental scale, extraordinary materials.
"Where did he get the money?"
The found objects were real. They were also constraint. The vision always operated at a different scale than the materials allowed. art1056 — a sculpture made from old light bulbs, tubes, and wires — is in the archive and is representative of what the found-object method produced. View art1056 →
Oral history needed
What specifically draws Jeff to Kiefer's work — beyond "everything"? When did he first encounter it? What did it feel like to see what was possible at that scale and with those resources? How did the found-object practice evolve over fifty years?
Quotes verbatim from oral history sessions, June 2026. Kiefer passage is paraphrase — drawn from oral history, needs Jeff's confirmation before this story is considered fully documented.
Collaboration with Grandchildren — Approximately 2022–Present
Getting Hard to Tell
For approximately four years, Jeff has been incorporating his grandchildren's drawings into his work.
"Whatever they want to make, and whatever I want to do with it."
The boundary between what the grandchildren contribute and what Jeff contributes has become unclear.
"Getting hard to tell where they end and I begin."
"I think that's right."
This is the only part of the archive that faces forward — still happening, involving living people other than Jeff, with no clear endpoint. In fifty years, the most likely reason someone opens this archive is to recognize hands they know. See the collaborative works →
Oral history needed — names and specifics
Which grandchildren? Their names. How old were they when the collaboration began? What specifically do they contribute — drawings, marks, whole sections? Do they know these works are in the archive? Have they seen the finished pieces?
Quotes verbatim from oral history session, June 2026.
Building the Archive — 2021–2026
Took a Fucking Long Time
Jeff built the archive alone.
"Took a fucking long time. Moments of doubt in the middle."
The archive now contains 1,084 works. It covers 1974 to the present. Every work has been cataloged, photographed, and given a static page.
He built it for his daughters' families and their future generations — as a practical reference for the physical works they will inherit, and as proof that the lost work existed.
Some of the best pieces exist now in a single photograph. The archive is not a complete record. It is what survived.
Oral history needed
What did the process of building the archive feel like? What were the moments of doubt? What did putting everything in one place reveal about the work that hadn't been visible when it was scattered?
Quotes verbatim from oral history session, June 2026.
On Anselm Kiefer — 2026
Where Did He Get the Money
When asked what artist he would work like if money were no object, Jeff named Anselm Kiefer — large studio, monumental scale, extraordinary works. When asked what draws him to Kiefer's work:
"Everything."
Scale, materials, subject matter, the whole thing.
"Where did he get the money?"
The found objects were real. They were also constraint. The vision that ran for fifty years may have always operated at a different scale than the materials allowed. What Jeff made was not necessarily what Jeff imagined making. That gap is part of the record.
Confirmation needed + oral history
This story is drawn from oral history and needs Jeff's confirmation before it is considered fully documented. Additional session needed: what is there about Kiefer specifically — beyond "everything" — that Jeff recognizes in relation to his own ambitions?
Quotes verbatim from oral history session, June 2026. Surrounding context is paraphrase.
Stories Not Yet Documented
The following stories are known to exist — they are named here because they are in Jeff's memory. They cannot be written until the relevant oral history sessions are conducted.
Story — The Guernica-Scale Painting (partial)
Jeff made a full-size interpretation of Picasso's Guernica in his basement studio — approximately 11 × 25 feet, built from collage materials on flexible support so it could be rolled. It lived in the basement. No one else ever saw it. It was later moved to storage, where it was lost in the water damage. It was never photographed. When asked why he made something at that scale, after thirty years of working with Guernica as a reference: "it was about time." What it looked like, what he changed from Picasso's composition, what it felt like to work at that scale — these have not been captured.
Story — The Grandchildren
For approximately four years, Jeff has incorporated his grandchildren's drawings into work. The grandchildren are Sebastian, Caspar, Anthony, and Emilia. What each contributes, whether they know they are in the archive, whether they have seen the finished pieces — these have not yet been captured.
Story — A Day of Making
Jeff still makes things most days as of 2026. What that actually looks like — where he works, what time of day, what he reaches for first, what a specific ordinary day of making looks like right now at 71 — has not been captured.
For the Grandchildren
What He Wants a Grandchild to Know
"That they would be very impressed if they had the chance to see all the works in one space."
Not about meaning. Not about legacy. The physical experience of scale — all 1,084 works together, in one room. That is what he wants them to know.
Verbatim from oral history session, June 2026.